Adding JDK1.5 removing 1.1 support.
От | Kris Jurka |
---|---|
Тема | Adding JDK1.5 removing 1.1 support. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSO.4.56.0407150739290.22178@leary.csoft.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Adding JDK1.5 removing 1.1 support.
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
The new V3 protocol code has removed support for compiling with a 1.1 JDK, but we still have the core implementation split between jdbc1 and jdbc2 classes. Should be combine these all into jdbc2 or is there a reason to keep these separate? To add JDK1.5 support I originally considered an ant conditional compilation method, but that was really ugly. Another idea I have is to create a jdbc3g subdirectory (JDBC3 w/ Generics) that wouldn't house any implementation (AbstractJdbc3g* classes), but would just have the classes to offer the API desired by the 1.5 JDK. This means something like AbstractJdbc2Connection.setTypeMap(Map) would be renamed to something like setTypeMapImpl(Map) and setTypeMap(Map) would be added to Jdbc2Connection and Jdbc3Connection while Jdbc3gConnection would have setTypeMap(Map<String, Class<?>>) that would all just call setTypeMapImpl. Does this make sense to people? Kris Jurka
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: