Re: TODO item
От | Alex Pilosov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TODO item |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSO.4.10.10107042312310.7004-100000@spider.pilosoft.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | TODO item (Martín Marqués <martin@bugs.unl.edu.ar>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, [iso-8859-1] Mart�n Marqu�s wrote: > I was thinking about a par of things that I think are quite interesting for > the 7.2 release. > > The first one is related to a problem I had with views and rules (permission > problem). If someone is granted insert on a view with his respective rule, > won't be able to insert a row if there is a sequence (SERIAL type), saying > that the user doesn't have permission to change the sequence. Essentially, sequence is treated as a separate table for purposes of permission checking. Its probably _not very hard_ to fix, by forcing check of the underlying relation instead of check of sequence itself...Whether its a right thing to do, I'm not sure. > The other is related to indexes on databases other then initiated with C > locale. The docs say that those databases don't use the indexes on sequencial > searches. Is this right? Only queries using LIKE 'foo%', cannot use indices. Reason: you don't know what foo will collate in different locale, i.e. there may be foo with umlaut o, which _should_ match 'foo', but you cannot index this kind of a search...
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: