Re: Questions about Synonyms - Again
От | Alex Pilosov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Questions about Synonyms - Again |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSO.4.10.10101191159510.32250-100000@spider.pilosoft.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Questions about Synonyms - Again (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
I think this should wait till proper schema support is implemented. Most frequent use of synonym is to create a public alias to a object in a private schema. -alex On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Do we want to add this to the TODO list? > > [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > > I am comparing it to Oracle's public synonyms, where you can use different > > names for things. > > For example, table "THIS_IS_A_VERY_BYG_NAME" could be accessed using a > > smaller name, example "TIAVBN". > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e@gmx.net] > > > Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 3:56 PM > > > To: Colin Taylor > > > Cc: Pgsql Mailing List (E-mail) > > > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Questions about Synonyms - Again > > > > > > > > > Colin Taylor writes: > > > > > > > Are Synonyms supported on Postgresql? > > > > > > There is nothing in PostgreSQL that's called a "synonym" per > > > se, so you > > > have to describe what you mean by it. > > > > > > -- > > > Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/ > > > > > > > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: