Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database?
От | Alex Pilosov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSO.4.10.10011301910540.28752-100000@spider.pilosoft.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database? ("Mr. Shannon Aldinger" <god@yinyang.hjsoft.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Mr. Shannon Aldinger wrote: > Linux kernel 2.2.x unpatched has the 2GB file size and 1GB ram limit. > Patched with the lfs package the 2GB file size limit goes away. > The lfs patch needs applied against gnu-libc as well. This alone may not > avoid the 2GB limit, the application must use the lseek64 instead of > lseek, for example. lfs will be included by default in the upcoming 2.4.x That's automatic, if you compile your source with -D_LARGE_FILES (or something like that, don't remember exact names). > kernels. The upcoming 2.4.x kernels also support more ram. I'm fairly > certain ram patches exist for the 2.2.x series. > > I have just one question to ask will postgresql 7.1 include full support > for using lseek64, stat64, etc? Postgres doesn't need to. Just autoconf script needs to have an option --with-large-files argument that would add -D_LARGE_FILES to CFLAGS. -alex
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: