Re: [GENERAL] Stored Procedures
От | Brett W. McCoy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Stored Procedures |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSI.3.91.991105113706.13526B-100000@access1.lan2wan.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Stored Procedures ("Moray McConnachie" <moray.mcconnachie@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 5 Nov 1999, Moray McConnachie wrote: > > Yes, quite extensively, and far beyond what SQL 7 offers. You may > want > > to take a look at the programmer's manual for the documentation. > > I thought we had rather a long debate recently about whether and if > Postgres did/should support stored procedures, and the point was that > it doesn't at the moment? > > PL/PgSQL functions are not at all the same thing, although they are > obviously very useful. What's the difference between the two, then? What does a stored procedure do that a function doesn't? The PostgreSQL 'CREATE FUNCTION', as it is described in the documentation, is very similar to the not yet standardized stored module facility in SQL. Brett W. McCoy http://www.lan2wan.com/~bmccoy ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Commitment, n.: Commitment can be illustrated by a breakfast of ham and eggs. The chicken was involved, the pig was committed.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: