Re: [GENERAL] Optimizations for busy DB??
От | Brett W. McCoy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Optimizations for busy DB?? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSI.3.91.990513144044.12249E-100000@access1.lan2wan.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Optimizations for busy DB?? (Brian <signal@shreve.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Optimizations for busy DB??
Re: [GENERAL] Optimizations for busy DB?? |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 13 May 1999, Brian wrote: > Would something like this be appropriate? > > /usr/bin/postmaster -B 256 -i -S -D/var/lib/pgsql -o -F -B 256 -S 1024 > > or should -B just be in their once? in the postmaster setting? Just once. If you pass it back to a backend from the postmaster, the postmaster handles the allocation as shared memory buffers. Here's what the man page for postgres says: -B n_buffers If the backend is running under the postmaster, n_buffers is the number of shared-memory buffers that the postmaster has allocated for the backend server processes that it starts. If the backend is running standalone, this specifies the number of buffers to allocate. This value defaults to 64, and each buffer is 8k bytes. I am assuming here, of course, that this didn't change betwen 6.3 and 6.4 (which is what I am using). Brett W. McCoy http://www.lan2wan.com/~bmccoy ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "A raccoon tangled with a 23,000 volt line today. The results blacked out 1400 homes and, of course, one raccoon." -- Steel City News
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: