Re: PostgreSQL Scalable ?
От | Jeff |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL Scalable ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.44.0310101253380.78002-100000@torgo.978.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgreSQL Scalable ? (Hervé Piedvache <herve@elma.fr>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, [iso-8859-15] Herv� Piedvache wrote: > One other small question ... Does PostgreSQL is scalable ? > I mean ... is it possible to have two servers, one rack of disks connected to > the 2 servers to get access in same time to the same database ? No. You need to replicate the DB to another machine to have this work - and even still, all writes need to go to the 'master' db. Reads can go to either. > To be clear I would like to make a system with PostgreSQL able to answer about > 70 000 000 requests by day (Internet services) ... I'm not sure about the > server configuration I have to make. > Well, 70M requests/day is only about 810 / second - assuming we're talking about simple selects that is very easy to achieve. Considering hardware you should look at: multiple cpus, gigs of memory, and very fast disks. (Raid5 w/battery backed write caches seem to be popular). You should also look at how much data this guy will hold, what is the read/write ratio and all the "normal" things you should do while planning a db. -- Jeff Trout <jeff@jefftrout.com> http://www.jefftrout.com/ http://www.stuarthamm.net/
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: