Re: AW: Postgres Replication
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: AW: Postgres Replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.33.0106120605130.411-100000@mobile.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | AW: Postgres Replication (Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: AW: Postgres Replication
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
which I believe is what the rserv implementation in contrib currently does ... no? its funny ... what is in contrib right now was developed in a weekend by Vadim, put in contrib, yet nobody has either used it *or* seen fit to submit patches to improve it ... ? On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote: > > > Although > > Postgres-R is a synchronous approach, I believe it is the closest to > > the goal mentioned above. Here is an abstract of the advantages. > > If you only want synchronous replication, why not simply use triggers ? > All you would then need is remote query access and two phase commit, > and maybe a little script that helps create the appropriate triggers. > > Doing a replicate all or nothing approach that only works synchronous > is imho not flexible enough. > > Andreas > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl > Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: