Re: Re: 7.1 RPMs

On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> > If someone wants to come up with an idea for name, i think that the whole
> > Win camp could be seperated also ...
>
> > pgsql-windows and pgsql-rpm ?
>
> A windows list seems like a good idea.  But I'm not sure that a
> separate list for RPMs is a good idea.  In the first place, it's
> fuzzy: is it to be used just for RPM packaging discussion, or is it
> going to draw off --- for example --- all bug reports from people who
> happen to have installed from RPM instead of source?  I suppose the
> former is intended, but it's not going to be clear to people.  I think
> we've already got too many lists with fuzzy boundaries.  In the second
> place, the RPM packaging discussion is quite sporadic; I think the
> traffic would be nil except at times when Lamar is working on new
> RPMs.

That's why I wasn't sure how to classify the RPM one ...

I like Lamar's suggestion of pgsql-cygwin though ... sound reasonable?