Re: pgsql/doc/src/sgml admin.sgml advanced.sgml ar ...
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql/doc/src/sgml admin.sgml advanced.sgml ar ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.31.0101132346060.500-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql/doc/src/sgml admin.sgml advanced.sgml ar ... (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-committers |
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > Log message: > > > > Terminology cleanup: class -> table, instance -> row, attribute -> column, > > > > etc. > > > > > > Yeeh. > > > > sad, actually ... we try to be SQL complaint, yet we can't handle the > > terminology? :( > > Yes, I know we are baby-ing the terminology. My feeling is that this > stuff is complicated enough, and we should make it as easy as possible, > but I realize this is debatable. > > Someone brought this about my book's use of terminology. As Tom brought up, I may be the one confused here ... but, our documentation should be using the *accurate* terminology ... if that is table/row/column, so be it, it was me confused ... if it is something else (class/instance/attribute), then *that* is what our documentation should be providing ... If you want simpilication/babying, switch to Microsoft ... if you want to learn/undertand, then use a real database ... How does Oracle refer to them? How does Informix? Sybase?
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: