Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
От | Vince Vielhaber |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.30.0108161516140.14255-100000@paprika.michvhf.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > > > I don't follow this argument. You added a config option that toggles > > > whether to use the old crypt(3) method or the new md5 method. > > > > ?? If the config option works like that, I think it's wrong. There > > shouldn't *be* a config option, unless it's one that turns off MD5 > > because the platform hasn't got int64 support. An MD5-enabled server > > or client must still be able to do crypt too, in order to speak to > > older clients or servers. > > Sorry, when I said config, I meant pg_hba.conf. Was that unclear? > > Also, I will replace md5.c with pgcrypto/md5.c. what's the difference? Vince. -- ========================================================================== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com ==========================================================================
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: