Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords
От | Vince Vielhaber |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.30.0106151059010.9395-100000@paprika.michvhf.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Migrating old sites to encrypted pg_shadow passwords should be easy if a > > > trigger on pg_shadow will look for unencrypted INSERTs and encrypt them. > > > > If encrypting pg_shadow will break the old-style crypt method, then I > > think forcing a conversion via a trigger is unacceptable. It will have > > to be a DBA choice (at configure time, or possibly initdb?) whether to > > use encryption or not in pg_shadow; accordingly, either crypt or "new > > crypt" auth method will be supported by the server, not both. But > > client libraries could be built to support both auth methods. > > I hate to add initdb options because it may be confusing. I wonder if > we should have a script that encrypts the pg_shadow entries that can be > run when the administrator knows that there are no old clients left > around. That way it can be run _after_ initdb. Which clients actually read pg_shadow? I always thought that only the postmaster read it. Vince. -- ========================================================================== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo atPop4 Networking Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com ==========================================================================
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: