RE: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission criticalapplications?
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | RE: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission criticalapplications? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.9912291821340.880-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission criticalapplications? ("Barnes" <aardvark@ibm.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 29 Dec 1999, Barnes wrote: > It would be helpful to me to hear about successful and stable > implementations as well. If some of you who are using PostgreSQL > successfully could comment on your experiences, I think it would shed some > worthwhile light on it's capabilities. I'm considering using it for a > mission critical project, and I would like to know what I am getting into. > Thank you. At work, its the backend for our DNS/DHCP tables, servicing over 4000 lap/desktops ... For business, its the accounting backend for two ISPs that I work with for their dialup lines, is the backend for the search engine that Vince and I are currently working on getting online for PostgreSQL...is the backend for a project I'm working with that deals with, esssentially, resource management for banks... The only one above that I don't consider "mission critical" is the search... > > David Barnes > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org > [mailto:owner-pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org]On Behalf Of Ed Loehr > Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 1999 11:23 AM > To: Jochen Topf > Cc: pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission > criticalapplications? > > > > > My question of an earlier posting is still not answered. Does anybody > > here, > > > who reported PostgreSQL to be very stable, use advanced features like > > pl/pgsql > > > procedures, triggers, rules and notifies? Lets have a show of hands. I > > would > > > really like to know, why I am the only one having problems. :-) Although > > > it might be, because, as this is a PostgreSQL mailing list, most of the > > > readers are people who are happy with PostgreSQL, because all the others > > > have left and are on an Oracle list now. :-) > > I use triggers, PL/pgSQL procedures/functions, and rules on 6.5.2, and I > have > experienced a number of what might be called instability problems for > whatever > reason. A review of the posts to the pgsql mailing lists will confirm that > you > are not alone in finding some points of instability. But the extent of any > instability is not clear. Watch for a web poll announcement in January to > get > a better handle on that data... > > Cheers, > Ed Loehr > > > ************ > > > > ************ > Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: