Re: Numerical DB/Table Names
От | Stephan Szabo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Numerical DB/Table Names |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0109141643370.44726-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Numerical DB/Table Names (Jeff Brickley <jeff.brickley@motorola.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Jeff Brickley wrote: > I've just recently started working with PostgreSQL. We have a 7.0 > insallation and everything seems to work fine. I am embarking on > upgrading to 7.1.3 but have run into a problem. All of the databases > are stored with numerical names in the /$prefix/base directory. They > seem to be stored as binaries so I am unable to open any files under > that directory. I know that in our 7.0 version of PostgreSQL all > databases have a directory under the /$prefix/base directory that is > labeled as the name of the database. Inside each database directory the > physical data is stored in files that have the same name as all the > relationships in the database. I can still insert and retrieve data > from any database created on this new 7.1.3 cluster but am not > comfortable with not being able to read the data files. > Has anyone encountered this problem? Thanks in advance for any help you > can provide. From contrib/oid2name's readme: "With version 7.1 of PostgreSQL server, the old naming scheme for databases and tables (in $PGDATA/base) has changed. The databases are put in folders for their OID in pg_database and the tables in that folder are named for their OIDs in pg_class." The reason for the change was IIRC to better handle rollback of create/drop statements. It looks like the contrib/oid2name will give you the #/name relationships (although it probably connects to the database to do it)
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: