Re: Bug about 'Foreign Key'
От | Stephan Szabo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug about 'Foreign Key' |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0103270827220.68851-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Bug about 'Foreign Key' ("Cid R Andrade" <crandrade@opeco.com.br>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
This should be fixed for 7.1, it now checks that the referencing columns exist on the fk table and that the referenced columns are part of a unique index [our unique/pkey] on the referenced table. On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Cid R Andrade wrote: > PostgreSQL Developers, > > I have a PostgreSQL 7.0.2 running at Conectiva Linux, with kernel 2.2.14, with 56 Mb of data. > > I'd created a table: > Create Table Andamento ( > Etiqueta integer not null, > CodTecnico integer not null, > DtInicio timestamp not null, > DtLiberacao timestamp null, > Primary Key (Etiqueta), > Foreign Key (Etiquetas) References Etiquetas (Etiqueta) On Delete Cascade) > I wrong a field name in Foreign Key declaration, > and PostgreSQL created it! Before this, I always named triggers and > constraints, but, at this time, I'd tried this way. Well, look the > trigger at table Etiquetas: CREATE CONSTRAINT TRIGGER "<unnamed>" > AFTER DELETE ON "etiquetas" NOT DEFERRABLE INITIALLY IMMEDIATE FOR > EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE "RI_FKey_noaction_del" ('<unnamed>', > 'andamento', 'etiquetas', 'UNSPECIFIED', 'etiquetas', 'etiqueta'); > > It says exists a field named etiquetas at table Andamento. > I'd droped table andamento (Drop Table Andamento) and the trigger referencing it didn't droped. > > I solved it with pg_dump. >
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: