Re: Weird indices
От | Stephan Szabo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Weird indices |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0102191840260.85555-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Weird indices (Joseph Shraibman <jks@selectacast.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Joseph Shraibman wrote: > Joseph Shraibman wrote: > > > > > Can't postgres do the index lookup first and find out there are only a > > few tuples that might match? > > > > o=# select count(*) from usertable where p in(1,33) group by p; > count > ------- > 16 > 502 > (2 rows) > > This raises some other questions. Why can't postgres get the count(*) > from the index? Why doesn't it predict the correct number of rows in > the planner? (25 estimated vs 16 actual). First question: Mostly the same reason. Not all of the index entries are necessarily real active rows that you can see, so you would still have to hit the heap file to get that data, so I'd guess you're already hitting the entire heap file. [Tom answered the second]
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: