Re: Performance-Tuning
От | Stephan Szabo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance-Tuning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0101190945180.5520-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Performance-Tuning (Konstantinos Agouros <elwood@agouros.de>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Well, since you're grouping, you don't need the distinct on (it's sort of assumed by group by - you're only going to get one group for each distinct value set of your grouped columns). In my explain, this cuts out a unique step on my small tables, not sure how significant that's going to be on an already unique set of columns though. On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Konstantinos Agouros wrote: > Hi, > > I have a table with the fields data(timestamp), region and url (varchar) > This table has 4.5mio entries a day. To reduce them I use the following > insert-statement. > > insert into msreduce select distinct on (region, url) '1-16-2001',region,url,count(client) from microsoftlog where date> '1-16-2001' and date < '1-17-2001' group by region,url > > My question: Could this be optimized?
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: