RE: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available .
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | RE: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available . |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0012112110500.29523-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available . ("Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>) |
Ответы |
Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available .
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Mikheev, Vadim wrote: > > > > If Vadim isn't sufficiently confident of it to commit it > > > > on his own authority, I'm inclined to leave it out of 7.1. > > > > My concern is mostly schedule. We are well into beta cycle > > > > now and this seems like way too critical (not to say high-risk) > > > > a feature to be adding after start of beta. > > > > > > I was wondering if Vadim was hesitant because he had done this > > > under contract. Vadim, are you concerned about reliability or > > > are there other issues? > > > > Irrelevant .. we are post-beta release, and this doesn't fix > > a bug, so it doesn't go in ... > > 1. I'm confident about code quality. > 2. Copyright issue is resolved. > 3. But we're in beta now. > > If there are no objections then I'm ready to add changes to 7.1. > Else, I'll produce patches for 7.1 just after release and incorporate > changes into 7.2. > > Comments? IMHO, we are in beta now and this doesn't fix a bug ... if we could make this available as a patch in /contrib until 7.1 is released, i would much prefer that ...
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: