Re: Your RDBMS Survey ...
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Your RDBMS Survey ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0012040956230.1558-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Your RDBMS Survey ... (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, mycgiserver wrote: > Hi, > > that's an idea, however this approach would fail if 2 clients in an INTRANET > would like to cast a vote, only the gateway IP would be visible to our > server and that would cause the second client to be rejected. > > See, it ain't that easy. okay, so instead you are proposing to make the vote only accessible to users of your system (re: original email response) ... so now, instead of losing the *occasional* person that is sharing an IP, you lose everyone? > -----Original Message----- > From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> > To: mycgiserver <general@mycgiserver.com> > Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org <pgsql-general@postgresql.org> > Date: 4. Dez 2000 14:35 > Subject: Re: Your RDBMS Survey ... > > > > > >Good point, about the proxy ... we run Squid at work, and you are corect > >that REMOTE_ADDR will show up the proxy server's IP, but, at least with > >Squid, a second environment variable will be setup in that case, called > >'HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR', that contains the true IP of the visitor ... > > > >A simple: > > > >if(HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR) { > > use this IP > >} else { > > use REMOTE_ADDR > >} > > > >would work around that limitation/problem ... > > Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: