Re: pg_trigger and tgargs

On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Michael Fork wrote:

> I was wondering if someone could tell me if I have gotten the fields of
> tgargs correct:
For foreign key constraints, yes.  Other triggers can use tgargs for
whatever they want.
> <unnamed>\000 -- Constraint name?
Yes.

> foreign_table_multi\000 -- table with foreign key(s)
> primary_table_multi\000 -- table with primary key(s)
Yep.
> UNSPECIFIED\000         -- ??
What match type was specified (or unspecified if none was specified).

> foreign_int_1\000       -- 1st field in foreign key
> 
> primary_int_1\000       -- 1st field in referenced primary key
> 
> foreign_int_2\000       -- 1st field in foreign key 
> primary_int_2\000       -- 1st field in referenced primary key
2nd on the latter two, but yes in general