Re: [HACKERS] Re: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL
От | joseph@randomnetworks.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0011150926100.442-100000@rodan.water-programs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL ("carl garland" <carlhgarland@hotmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, carl garland wrote: # >perhaps why, even at 5 clients, the page views he shows never went # >significantly above 10/sec? # # I think alot of it has to do with the web server/db setup not pg. They are # using Apache/PHP and looking at their code every page has the additional # overhead of making the db connection. Now if they had used AOLserver with # its persistent db connecction pooling scheme they may have faired better ;) I haven't actually looked at their code they used to test with to see if they are actually using it, but Apache/PHP has the ability to do persistent db connections. I would be surprised that someone like Tim ( who seems to have done a fair bit of php with db stuff) would not make use of such a feature. If you can point out an example of where they are not using this feature I will gladly stand corrected. -------------------------------------------------------------------- | Joseph Scott The Office Of Water Programs | | joseph@randomnetworks.com joseph.scott@owp.csus.edu | --------------------------------------------------------------------
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: