Re: AW: v7.0.3 *pre-release* ...
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: AW: v7.0.3 *pre-release* ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0011071655450.2607-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: AW: v7.0.3 *pre-release* ... (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: AW: v7.0.3 *pre-release* ...
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
If its that easy to fix the regress test so that it passes, can we get it committed and build a new tarball so that ppl doing regression on v7.0.3 see a clean regress? On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Tom Lane wrote: > Pete Forman <gsez020@kryten.bedford.waii.com> writes: > > The only remaining failure is geometry. The results I got were nearly > > identical to geometry-powerpc-aix4.out. The only differences were the > > order of rows returned by three of the tables. I'll submit the > > results file to pgsql-patches. > > Rather than making still another results file, let's fix the .sql file > to do an explicit ORDER BY for those queries. The regress tests are > mostly pretty lazy about ensuring a platform-independent ordering of > query results. In many places we can get away with that, but every so > often we notice another place where we can't. Looks like you've just > identified another. > > regards, tom lane > > Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: