Re: AW: Backup, restore & pg_dump
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: AW: Backup, restore & pg_dump |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0010161008280.321-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | AW: Backup, restore & pg_dump (Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: AW: Backup, restore & pg_dump
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I like the pg_{import,export} names myself ... *nod* On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote: > > > > > As a result do people have any objection to changing pg_restore to > > > > pg_undump? Or pg_load? > > Also possible would be a name like Oracle > pg_exp and pg_imp for export and import. > (or pg_export and pg_import) > > Load and unload is often more tied to data only (no dml). > > I agree that the current name pg_restore for its current functionality > is not good and misleading in the light of WAL backup. > > Andreas > > Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: