Re: FreeBSD Softupdates??
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FreeBSD Softupdates?? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0009261228490.4209-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FreeBSD Softupdates?? (Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: FreeBSD Softupdates??
|
Список | pgsql-general |
I've been runing since softupdates became mainstream, on a relatively heavily used production server ... I can't answer about performance gains/loss, but from what I know of softupdates, it should be neglible for a database system ... but, I haven't been 'shot in the foot' yet for any of our database ... On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Neil Conway wrote: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 03:20:31AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > It can cause problems because softupdates makes meta data changes > > (in this case file creation/removal) asyncronously, the same actually > > happens with most other logging filesystems that don't support > > transactions. > > I've been running FreeBSD 4.1 with soft updates on my development box > for a while now without any problems at all. Although it's not > production so there's not a lot of load on PgSQL. > > I don't know if it hurts or hampers performance. > > HTH, > > Neil > > -- > Neil Conway <neilconway@home.com> > Get my GnuPG key from: http://klamath.dyndns.org/mykey.asc > Encrypted mail welcomed > > I am not interested in the past. I am interested in the future for > that is where I intend to spend the rest of my life. > -- Charles F. Ketterring > Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: