Re: Status of new relation file naming
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Status of new relation file naming |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0009121805280.1305-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Status of new relation file naming (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Status of new relation file naming
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > [ Charset KOI8-R unsupported, converting... ] > > > > Where are we in subj? > > > > Oid.version or UniqueId? > > > > If noone is going to implement it soon then I'll have to > > > > change code to OID file naming for WAL. > > > > > > Well, we can move to one of these, but we need tools so people can find > > > the real table names that go with the files, and even then, it will > > > never be as good as the system we currently have. > > > > I thought it was generally agreed that this wasn't a requirement, and that > > is someone felt it was required in the future, like any open source > > project, they could ante up the time to build it ... > > Well, if we release 7.1 without those tools, we can expect lots of > complaints. stock answer "we look forward to seeing patches to correct this problem" :)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: