Re: Anyone care about type "filename" ?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От The Hermit Hacker
Тема Re: Anyone care about type "filename" ?
Дата
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.21.0007312308230.570-100000@thelab.hub.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Anyone care about type "filename" ?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Anyone care about type "filename" ?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > I'm thinking of removing the datatype "filename", which is a fixed-size
> > array of 256 characters with no support functions other than input and
> > output converters.  Apparently it was once used in the system tables,
> > but it is so no longer AFAICT.  Since it's fixed-length, it cannot be
> > made TOASTable, which makes it substantially inferior to type "text"
> > for any purpose that I can think of.
> > 
> > Anyone using this type?
> 
> I vote for removal.

works for me too ...

curious though, but why would such a type even be used in the system
tables?  what difference does it have to a varchar(256)?



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Philip Warner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_dump + function/table hierarchy
Следующее
От: Philip Warner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_dump & performance degradation