Re: pg_backup symlink?
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_backup symlink? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0007102039040.3314-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_backup symlink? (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_backup symlink?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Philip Warner wrote: > At 18:58 10/07/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > > >There are dozens of other examples in any standard Unix system. Just > >to take one example, 'ls' has six different links to it on my Unix box, > >and they all act differently (ie, supply different default switches to > >the basic 'ls' behavior). > > > >Peter is definitely swimming upstream if he hopes to get anyone to adopt > >the above as received wisdom. > > > > Does this mean that using a pg_backup symlink would be deemed acceptable? yes :) both 'commands' should be documented in the man pages too ... right? :)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: