Re: Odd release numbers for development versions?
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Odd release numbers for development versions? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0006061416410.465-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Odd release numbers for development versions? ("Robert B. Easter" <reaster@comptechnews.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
not in this life time ... On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Robert B. Easter wrote: > Is PostgreSQL going to start using odd release numbers for development > versions? This is how the Linux kernel is, and some other projects. > > Version.release.revision/build > > Like 7.0.x would be the current stable branch. 7.1.x, the current development > branch. The next stable branch would be 7.2.x. Within the current even > release stable branch, maybe only do bug fixes. In the odd dev releases, focus > on new/experiemental. Both branches could have very frequent *.x > revisions/builds. I guess you'd have to apply patches to both branches > sometimes, like when a bug is found in 7.0.x, it is patched and the same patch > applied to the 7.1.x if needed. > > This way there would be a clear distinction for users what is likely to be good > for production use and what is still unproven. > > -- > Robert B. Easter > reaster@comptechnews.com > Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: