Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0005252134270.80347-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 25 May 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Well, I am not sure. In the book, I say you can use a normal file > > > system backup if the database is idle, or use pg_dumpall and backup the > > > file it creates. In fact, once you run pg_dumpall, there is no need to > > > backup the /data directory except for the few configuration files like > > > pg_hba.conf. Does this make sense? > > > > when you mean 'idle', do you mean 'read-only'? else the files in > > /data/base/* would be changing, no? > > No, like everyone has gone home and nothing is happening. okay, so this is used on an IntraNet where 'schedualed downtime' is an option ... then doing a shutdown, tar, and startup makes sense ...
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: