Re: Postgres Instability
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres Instability |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0005242127080.243-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres Instability (Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop@h00a0cc3b7988.ne.mediaone.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 24 May 2000, Karl DeBisschop wrote: > The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > > > On Wed, 24 May 2000, Karl DeBisschop wrote: > > > > > The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 24 May 2000, planx plnetx wrote: > > > > > > > > > I've remarked that postgresql-7.0 have two important bugs no, no... > > > > > I'll define its Problems. > > > > > > > > > > The first is that it is very subsceptible to ipc: it's true that sometimes > > > > > U need to do an ipcclean to remake it start > > > > > > > > This sounds like a Linux problem to me ... I've got v7.0 running on a > > > > server over here that is dealign with the Search engine for the PostgreSQL > > > > site (over 10million tuples in one table, indexing over 90k URLs) and the > > > > server has been running flawlessly for the past ~14days now, and what is > > > > only because that was the last time we rebooted it ... > > > > > > We've been running 7.0 on a linux server since RC3 on a database with > > > over 40 million tuples without this problem (all 40 million tuples are > > > indexed on 3 fields). So I'm not sure I see how it can be concluded > > > that this is a linux problem. > > > > Could his Linux server be mis-configured? > > Could be. But he said he installed separately on several installs - > redhat 6.1, 6.2, and mandrake I believe. > > I don't think he indicated whether he used the RPMS or compiled himself. > Assuming this is some sort of configuration issue, which seems sort of > likely, it's at least as likely that it's related to a misunderstanding > about how to cofigure postgreSQL. > > Since I can't reproduce the error, and since I'm only beginning to get > familiar with little bits of the DBMS internals, I can't really help. > But I did want to put my counter-example out there so that Linux users > wouldn't get the sense that your fine product is somehow unreliable on > Linux. IIRC, Linux is a large part of your installed base - no real > point in scaring them off. Even if there are other legitimate arguments > for other OS's. no probs, I just wanted to point out the possibility that it was a server config issue, and not a postgresql one ... as I mentioned in another part of this thread, FreeBSD doesn't enable SharedMemory by default, so without a kernel build, you can't use PostgreSQL :(
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: