Re: Problems with the new Majordomo 2.
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Problems with the new Majordomo 2. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0005161306260.208-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Problems with the new Majordomo 2. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 16 May 2000, Tom Lane wrote: > The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes: > > PRS ... PostReleaseSyndrome ... ppl are rebuilding up their energy, > > watching for bugs while waiting for development to start up again. > > If he's only getting one or two messages a day, then something's surely > broken! According to my maillog there were 92 messages on the pghackers > list yesterday, and another 20+ on interfaces. > > However, I'm inclined to think that the breakage is on his end, since > no one else is complaining ... Regardless of which end is at fault, I am looking at this from our end anyway ... I'm wondering if maybe there was a connection problem to his system and the mail system itself just bounced it ... > BTW, did I mention that I confirmed majordomo had lost my subscription > to pgsql-patches? I did a who on the list and found no entry. > Curious. Doesn't seem to have happened on any other list, but it > explains why I've seen no patches for a good while. I'm embarressed to say that the Mj2 guys took a look at our system logs and, ummmm, it doesn't look like some ppl were subscribed to the pgsql-patches list when we first moved it over :( Looks like definitely operator error on this one *sigh*
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: