Re: Eternal vacuuming....
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Eternal vacuuming.... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0005111503340.82196-100000@hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Eternal vacuuming.... (Tim Perdue <tperdue@valinux.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 11 May 2000, Tim Perdue wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" wrote: > > what does a 'vacuum verbose' show for you? and youa ren't doing a 'vacuum > > analyze', are you? > > I believe I did 'vacuum analyze'. If info from 'vacuum verbose' would be > useful to your team, I can try to set up and reproduce this. I would > have to create a 3-million row table with an index on it, then delete > 832,000 rows which I did last nite, then try again. Okay, vacuum analyze is, from my experiences, atrociously slow ... it *feels* faster, at least, if you do a simple vacuum first, then do the analyze, but that might be just perception ... Can you try just a simple 'vacuum verbose' first, without the analyze, and see if that also takes 12hrs? Also, what are you running this on? Memory? CPU? Marc G. Fournier scrappy@hub.org Systems Administrator @ hub.org scrappy@{postgresql|isc}.org ICQ#7615664
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: