Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0005041252040.51171-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 4 May 2000, Tom Lane wrote: > The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes: > >>>> This worry anyone? :) > >>>> NOTICE: Index pg_group_sysid_index: NUMBER OF INDEX' TUPLES (0) IS NOT THE SAME AS HEAP' (1). > >>>> Recreate the index. > >>>> NOTICE: Index pg_group_name_index: NUMBER OF INDEX' TUPLES (0) IS NOT THE SAME AS HEAP' (1). > >>>> Recreate the index. > > It occurred to me that this would be the likely symptom if a CREATE > GROUP or ALTER GROUP command had neglected to update the indexes on > pg_group. However, I can't spot any such problem in the code nor > cause it to happen by hand. Anyone else have an idea? > > BTW Marc, do you happen to know what sequence of user and/or group > create/alter/drops might have been executed on your setup? the only group that is in pg_group is: template1=> select * from pg_group; groname |grosysid|grolist -------------+--------+-------------- trends_acctng| 0|{70,1007,1008} (1 row) and it was added ~2 weeks ago ... i tried deleting and re-adding it this morning, now it says (1 of 2) vs (0 of 1) ... I had a server lock up the other day running an RC2 code base, which a 'truss -p' on postmaster produced nothing ... I did a kill on the server, upgraded to the latest code and restarted it, after which this problem occur'd ... Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: