Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? )
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? ) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0005041030090.92638-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? ) ("Mitch Vincent" <mitch@huntsvilleal.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? )
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 4 May 2000, Mitch Vincent wrote: > Ok, the production server is a Celeron 433, 512 MEgs of PC100 ECC RAM, 2 18 > Gig Ultra 160 SCSI drives (only running at 80 megs since we dono't have a > 64-bit PCI slot). > > There is a big upgrade planned for this box when the motherboard we're > waiting for comes out.. > > The development server is a PII450, 128 Megs of RAM and Ultra 2 SCSI > drives.. However it's running several other things other than the database > and webserver so it has a small load. Wait, correct me if I'm wrong, but the more powerful CPU is in your development server? My understanding is that a Celeron is a chop'd up PII ... my first recommendation here is that if you are running a *server*, get rid of that Celeron ... from what I've been told about the difference, Celeron is a great, cheap chip for using in a desktop environment (its what I use at home), but shy away from it in a server environment, as the speed reduction of the reduced cache alone will hurt things ...
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: