Re: database file size bloat
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: database file size bloat |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0004141443100.2807-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: database file size bloat (Matthew Arnison <matthewa@physics.usyd.edu.au>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Matthew Arnison wrote: > the bloat is a big problem. i just checked it again, and the db has > balloooned to 20 megs again, with i think 2650 unused pages. this is after > vacuuming it last night. i guess we need to setup the vacuum script to run > every hour. i am worried about this locking out users during the > vacuuming, although i guess if it happens more often, it should take less > time. > > meanwhile, as for upgrading, i think i'll try 6.5.3 first. > > version 7 is still in beta. is it atleast as stable as 6.5.3? is it > atleast as fast as 6.5.3? it is generally felt in the developer lists that each release is generally more stable, and faster, then the previous one. I just put v7.0beta5 in place as the backend to the PostgreSQL Search function off of http://www.postgresql.org and with >5million tuples loaded already in the dictionary table, queries are still taking <1min to complete ... > > this is a live site allright. > > thanks for your advice, > matthew. > > On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Ed Loehr wrote: > > > Matthew Arnison wrote: > > > > > > three times now this week (on two different servers) the raw database on > > > disk has ballooned in size, from about 10 megs to 50 megs in two cases, > > > and from about 10 megs to 250 megs in another case. > > > > > > a VACUUM VERBOSE ANALYZE; cleans it back down to the proper size, but > > > meanwhile all the queries take half a minute, instead of less than a > > > second. and our load average skyrockets. > > > > Hi Matthew, > > > > I have no explanation for the bloat, but it is a well-known "postgresqlism" > > that you should consider running vacuum analyze at least nightly, possibly > > more frequently. [I run it hourly.] > > > > Also, there are about 300 reasons to consider upgrading to 7.0, most having > > to do with bug fixes and performance improvements. Unfortunately, there > > may be a few incompatibilities (particularly in some pl/pgsql > > incantations), so don't assume a seamless upgrade. > > > > Regards, > > Ed Loehr > > > Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: