Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0001241622250.79710-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns (Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns
Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Don Baccus wrote: > At 03:44 PM 1/24/00 -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > >Oh, there is a second drawback to it though ... > > > >DROP COLUMN name > >ADD COLUMN name <of a different type> > > > >Then what? :( > > I don't understand...the idea is to make the old column name > invisible, and therefore "add column" won't see it either. so the pg_* file that maintains the 'fields' in a table would have two fields of the same name, one enabled, one disabled? Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: