Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0001241233300.79710-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns (Adriaan Joubert <a.joubert@albourne.com>) |
Ответы |
OIDS (Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Adriaan Joubert wrote: > As a user let me just say that I have been waiting for all the > 'ALTER TABLE..' commands for a long time (changing constraints would be great > too!) and it has been mentioned many times that one should not use oids in > application code. The way I do it at the moment is to copy the table, so I > think all users are used to losing their oids when remocing a column from a > table. So while it is certainly better to keep the oids, Peter's code is a > big improvement on the current situation. Except, as Chris Bitmead brought up, OIDs appear to be a key requirement in ODBMSs ... so, if we want to go what I *think* is 'next generation', OIDs have to be kept ... Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: