Re: [SQL] Ordering a date_part() query ...
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [SQL] Ordering a date_part() query ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0001181842280.23487-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [SQL] Ordering a date_part() query ... (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Tom Lane wrote: > The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes: > >> Uh, why don't you just GROUP BY and ORDER BY stat_period? > > > Okay, maybe I'm misunderstanding GROUP BY, but my understanding is that it > > groups "like" values ... my above example would give me a count of all > > impressions received over a one hour period ... > > Oh, so "stat_period" is not a period label but an exact timestamp, > and you want to group into hourly blocks? OK, then group/order by > date_trunc("hour", stat_period) is probably what you want... good, ya had me worried I missed something in the docs on this one :) > I'd suggest choosing another name for the field, too ;-) *grin* I'm the only one that accesses it, so it doesn't much matter Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: