UdmSearch: tables vs indices ...
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | UdmSearch: tables vs indices ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0001060105030.18498-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] UdmSearch: tables vs indices ...
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
We've almost got UdmSearch up and running, and I'm noticing something odd: -rw------- 1 pgsql pgsql 204800 Jan 6 00:05 url -rw------- 1 pgsql pgsql 1622016 Jan 6 00:05 word_url url is: CREATE TABLE "url" ( "rec_id" int4 DEFAULT nextval('next_url_id') PRIMARY KEY, "status" int4 NOT NULL DEFAULT0, "url" character varying(128) NOT NULL, "content_type" character varying(32) NOT NULL DEFAULT '', "last_modified" character varying(32) NOT NULL DEFAULT '', "title" character varying(128) NOT NULL DEFAULT '', "text" character varying(255) NOT NULL DEFAULT '', "size" int4 NOT NULL DEFAULT 0, "indexed" int4 NOTNULL DEFAULT 0, "last_index_time" datetime NOT NULL DEFAULT 'Thu Dec 31 20:00:00 1970 GMT', "next_index_time"datetime NOT NULL DEFAULT 'Thu Dec 31 20:00:00 1970 GMT', "referrer" int4 NOT NULL DEFAULT 0, "tag" int4 NOT NULL DEFAULT 0, "hops" int4 NOT NULL DEFAULT 0, "keywords" character varying(255) NOT NULL DEFAULT'', "description" character varying(100) NOT NULL DEFAULT '', "crc" character varying(33) NOT NULL DEFAULT''); and word_url is: CREATE INDEX "word_url" on "dict" using btree ( "word" "varchar_ops", "url_id" "int4_ops" ); ============= is it just me, or does an index ~6x the size of the data itself look "odd"? Its an older v6.5.0 database (haven't had time to upgrade *sigh*), so if explains it, so be it...I'll do an upgrade ASAP...but if that doesn't? Thanks... Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: