Re: [GENERAL] Mailing Lists
От | Jeff MacDonald |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Mailing Lists |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.10.9912141446190.16188-100000@rage.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Mailing Lists (<kaiq@realtyideas.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> I said this before, hope not too annoying. > Is it possible to make the mailing lists downloadable text > files? of course, they need to be splited into several files i could do this, with just the plain text files, not the html/ mhonarc stuff. i have no issues with this. > a reasonable cut. most people will only need the more recent > ones. negative, we want all or nothing. past archives are very useful. that's why their archived :) > Is there any commercial interest that conflict with this? none at all, i'm open to any and all suggestions. > > > > On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, Jeff MacDonald wrote: > > > Hey folks, > > > > I'm working on the CD image for PostgreSQL again. It's now at > > quite a healty size of 664 megs, and grows daily as the mailing > > list archives grow. > > > > The lists are taking up >50% of the cd. I'm curious about people's > > opinions. The archives are a valuable resource. But out of those > > who have ever bought a cd, or those that would, > > > > Would you use the archives off the cd ? > > > > Consider the point, that these archives are possibly outdated when > > you receive the cd, and that the Live archives on www.postgresql.org > > are searchable. > > > > Depending on the consensus, we will either remove the archives from > > the cd distro all together, or find an alternate method of storing > > them on it. > > > > I'm also taking any suggestions to make the archives on the cd searchable. > > > > Thanks > > > > Jeff MacDonald > > jeff@hub.org > > > > =================================================================== > > So long as the Universe had a beginning, we can suppose it had a > > creator, but if the Universe is completly self contained , having > > no boundry or edge, it would neither be created nor destroyed > > It would simply be. > > =================================================================== > > > > > > > > ************ > > > Jeff MacDonald jeff@hub.org =================================================================== So long as the Universe had a beginning, we can suppose it had a creator, but if the Universe is completly self contained , having no boundry or edge, it would neither be created nor destroyed It would simply be. ===================================================================
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: