Re: [HACKERS] Fixing Simms' vacuum problems
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Fixing Simms' vacuum problems |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.10.9909121745070.54336-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Fixing Simms' vacuum problems (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Fixing Simms' vacuum problems
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 11 Sep 1999, Tom Lane wrote: > Once we have the changes, the next question is do we want to risk > back-patching them into 6.5.2? I can see several ways that we could > proceed: > 1. Back-patch into REL6_5, and postpone 6.5.2 release for a while > for beta-testing. > 2. Put out 6.5.2 now (since it already has several other useful fixes), > then back-patch, and release 6.5.3 after a beta-testing interval. > 3. Leave these changes out of 6.5.*, and try to get 6.6 out the door > soon instead. > > I am not eager to hurry 6.6 along --- I have a lot of half-done work > in the planner/optimizer that I'd like to finish for 6.6. Perhaps > choice #2 is the way to go. Comments? Option 2 makes *me* feel the most comfortable...we were holding off on 6.5.2 due to some things ppl were working on...are those complete? I can roll out a 6.5.2 tonight if everyone feel comfortable with it, or wait for a few days (Wednesday?) to make sure all is iron'd out? Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: