Re: [SQL] 2 million+ entries
От | Michael Richards |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [SQL] 2 million+ entries |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.10.9908260249250.27017-100000@scifair.acadiau.ca обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [SQL] 2 million+ entries ("G. Anthony Reina" <reina@nsi.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, G. Anthony Reina wrote: > That's fantastic! How much did that set you back? Are there any special > quirks about using Postgres on a multiple processor, multiple disk > system? Oops. To answer your second question. No. None whatsoever. The multi-disk array is handled by the RAID controller. To the OS it appears to be a gigantic disk. The RAID controller also has hardware cache so it can do nifty things like queue a large number of simultaneous requests and elevator sort them for seek efficiency. The machine also has a large amount of RAM. If you really need high performance, I've done nifty things like putting indexes on different disks. Postgres does not seem to have a problem with tables which have been physically moved and replace with symbolic links. I don't know how well it would handle DROP queries, but I'm not in the habit of dropping 10Gb tables very often. -Michael
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: