Re: Referential integrity question
От | Stephan Szabo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Referential integrity question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.10.10011051058280.6169-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Referential integrity question ("Raymond O'Donnell" <rod@iol.ie>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
This is a known problem with 7.0.x's ri implementation (for a complete explanation check the archives), it should be fixed in 7.1 due to go into beta soon. Stephan Szabo sszabo@bigpanda.com On Sun, 5 Nov 2000, Raymond O'Donnell wrote: > Hi all, > > Is this normal? - I have discovered the hard way that permissions > GRANTed to a user on one table influence that user's ability to > update another table in a foreign key relationship with it. To be > specific, here are the relevant bits of the two tables: > > create table usertypes ( > typecode varchar(16) primary key, > description varchar(64), > ); > > grant select on usertypes to webanon; > > create table users ( > uid varchar(16) primary key, > pwd varchar(16), > typecode varchar(16) references usertypes > on update cascade > ); > > grant select,insert,update,delete on users to webanon; > > Now, when user webanon tries to update a field in table "users", the > update doesn't happen.....however, it DOES happen if I grant update > permissions to webanon on table "usertypes".
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: