Re: PL/PGSQL Function problem.
От | Stephan Szabo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PL/PGSQL Function problem. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.10.10008151103460.86873-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PL/PGSQL Function problem. (Dirk Elmendorf <delmendo@rackspace.com>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
Actually, you can't do too much about it in PL/PGSQL, because IIRC there isn't a way right now to do that. I don't remember when PL/TCL came into existance (don't know TCL), but you'd be able to do it in that, and you can also do it from SPI in a C function. And finally, the obligatory upgrade message... Upgrade to 7.0.2 if you can, it's nice and stays crunchy in milk. :) Stephan Szabo sszabo@bigpanda.com On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Dirk Elmendorf wrote: > RedHat 6.2 /Postgres 6.53 > I'm still very new at PL/PGSQL but I have looked thru all the > documentation I could find before sending this in. > > > I have a function that I would like to be able to apply to multiple > tables without having to duplicate the code. I would like to be able > to pass in the table name I would like to apply the function to. I > cannot seem to get this to work. Below is what I have so far. I > would like to be able to have > > computers_equal(comp_one,comp_two,comp_table_one,comp_table_two); > > I cannot seem to find a way to pass in a text string to be used in > the select into statements. > > Anyone got any ideas on how I fix this other that writing a function > for all the permutations (ordered_parts vs used_parts , ordered_parts > vs new_parts, used_parts vs ordered_parts, new_parts vs > ordered_parts,new_parts vs used_parts, used_parts vs ordered_parts) > > Any advice would be appreciated.
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: