Re: [HACKERS] SQL statements: begin and end
От | Vince Vielhaber |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] SQL statements: begin and end |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.05.9911231108240.23191-100000@paprika.michvhf.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] SQL statements: begin and end (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, Tom Lane wrote: > My feeling is that application authors have already decided whether > they prefer "BEGIN" or "BEGIN TRANSACTION" or "BEGIN WORK", and trying > to enforce a single standard now is just going to irritate people and > break existing applications. I vote for leaving well enough alone. > > > Bruce, please don't use "begin" and "end" in your book. > > Sure, it makes sense for the book to consistently use "BEGIN WORK" > and "COMMIT WORK", which are probably the least likely to confuse > novices. But I think actually removing the other variants would be > just an exercise in causing trouble. I don't know how Oracle or most everyone else is doing it, but Sybase uses: begin transaction [transaction name] and commit transaction [transaction name] I don't see an end transaction in the quick ref, but they do have a: begin statement block end in there. Vince. -- ========================================================================== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com flame-mail: /dev/null # include <std/disclaimers.h> Have you seenhttp://www.pop4.net? Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com ==========================================================================
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: