Re: [HACKERS] 'idle' processes in v6.5?

On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Thomas Lockhart wrote:

> > ... under a Linux system ...
>               ^^^^^
> 
> Ah, finally seen the light...
> You didn't expect _that_ to go unnoticed, did you?

I'm getting paid *well* to put up with it :)

> > 19130  p2 S    0:00 /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postmaster -o -F -o /usr/local/pgsql/er
> > 19416  p2 S    0:00 /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postgres 127.0.0.1 nobody imp idle
> > 19418  p2 S    0:00 /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postgres 127.0.0.1 nobody imp idle
> > 19425  p2 S    0:00 /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postgres 127.0.0.1 nobody imp idle
> > 21163  p2 S    0:00 /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postgres 127.0.0.1 nobody imp idle
> > 21288  p2 S    0:00 /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postgres 127.0.0.1 nobody imp idle
> > 21290  p2 S    0:00 /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postgres 127.0.0.1 nobody imp idle
> > 21303  p2 S    0:00 /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postgres 127.0.0.1 nobody imp idle
> > 21445  p2 S    0:00 /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postgres 127.0.0.1 nobody imp idle
> > yet nobody is using that system yet except me testing a couple of times...
> 
> Yes, "nobody" *is* using the system. You sure you don't have a web
> server or something? Anything else running as "nobody"?

Ya, but no connections through it yet...does PHP auto-open connections to
the backend as a sort of cache/pool?

Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org