Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.05.9901062307560.417-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 6 Jan 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Start at the top of the table, go to the first 'blank' section (a deleted > > record)...find the next good record that will fit in the space, move it > > there...clear out the old space, etc... > > > > if dba issues a 'vacuum', lock the table and do all records at once, but > > otherwise try and vacuum the table live... > > > > With the new MVCC serialization, this concept should be less intrusive on > > readers, no? > > Wish I knew the answer. I can guess, but that isn't going to help. Guess == throwing in ideas, even if they are incorrect...the way I figure it, I through out alot of guesses...some of them spark ideas in others and we see some really neat ideas come out of it :) Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: