palloc() vs static define?
| От | The Hermit Hacker |
|---|---|
| Тема | palloc() vs static define? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.05.9812132335480.6029-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] palloc() vs static define?
Re: [HACKERS] palloc() vs static define? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
in commands/cluster.c, in function cluster, we define NewIndexName as:
char NewIndexName[NAMEDATALEN]; /* line 93 */
in function copy_index, we define it as:
char *NewIndexName; /* line 246 */
And then palloc(NAMEDATALEN) before it gets used...
Now, which we use doesn't much matter to me, but I would think some sort
of consistency would be in order...or am I missing something as far as
each are concerned? Is one method inheriently faster then another, or do
they have about the same performance characteristics?
Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: