Re: Mysql 321 - Mysql 322 - msql
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Mysql 321 - Mysql 322 - msql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.05.9811270846240.10939-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 27 Nov 1998, Andrew McNaughton wrote: > It's possibly stronger on features, but it's slower than mysql. It is > speed he's emphasizing. I've never actually installed mysql, so can't really compare the two, but I've been using PostgreSQL for everything I need an RDBMS for since I first took on the project 3 years ago now (wow, time flies)...each release has gotten progressively faster, but we've pretty much hit a limit as far as optimizations are concerned, there probably isn't a *noticeable* difference between v6.3.2 and v6.4... We are hoping to have the PREPARE statement put into v6.5, which should give a performance improvement in "repeatative queries", as the planning for the query can be done beforehand, taking out a step... > there was some discussion earlier this year on this list about adding > indexes suitable for fulltext searching to PostgreSQL. Did anything > happen in the end? It's the one feature I'd really like to have. I > suspect it would be an important one to James also. What do you mean by "fulltext searching"? Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: