Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.05.9811142234160.333-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA (Todd Graham Lewis <tlewis@mindspring.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 14 Nov 1998, Todd Graham Lewis wrote: > On Sat, 14 Nov 1998, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > > For instance, I already have MICO installed because of > > koffice...I'd prefer not to have to install *another* one because I want > > to use it for PostgreSQL. > > If I may, I'd like to put in a plug for ORBit. DISCLAIMER: I am the > GNOME FAQ maintainer. this isn't actually a voting process here...I don't want us locked into one implementation. there are ppl out there that would prefer to use mico because it is already installed on their system for some reason or another...there should be absolutely no reason why this can't be coded generic enough that, through a simple switch when running configure, one or the other can be used...no? > Again, I am a GNOME partisan, but I really do think that ORBit is a > good choice and a reliable long-term investment. I encourage the > PostgreSQL developers to consider it. I would rather our implementatin be "non-partisan"...what happens in a years time, or 6 months, when the "faults" in mico disappear, if they do? at least if we work at staying non-partisan as far as which implementation is used, switching will be transparent...all of them will already be supported. Bear in mind that ORBit and MICO are free implementations...what about the commercial ones out there? Just like we tend to try and support each OSs C compiler, I want us to stay non-partisan as far as any "external tools" are concerned... Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: